Ramon Magsaysay Award

Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF), Newyork established the Award in May 1957, to honor Philippine President Ramon Magsaysay's example of integrity in government, courageous service to the people, and pragmatic idealism within a democratic society.

Ramon Magsaysay Award is often considered Asia's Nobel Prize.

The first Ramon Magsaysay Awards were given on August 31, 1958.

Presentation Ceremonies are held annually in Manila on 31 August, the birth anniversary of the late President.

The Ramon Magsaysay Award Foundation (RMAF) presents it.

The awards are given in six categories:
1. Government Service
2. Public Service
3. Community Leadership
4. Journalism, Literature and Creative Communication Arts
5. Peace and International Understanding
6. Emergent Leadership

The Ramon Magsaysay Award is given to persons - regardless of race, nationality, creed or gender - who address issues of human development in Asia with courage and creativity, and in doing so have made contributions which have transformed their societies for the better.

The Magsaysay Award for Emergent Leadership seeks to inspire young people to apply their talents and energies to selfless and innovative service in Asia; this award category was created in 2000 with support from a Ford Foundation grant, and honors greatness of spirit among men and women forty years old and below.

Two hundred sixty-seven individuals and sixteen organizations have been named Magsaysay awardees since 1958.

The first year winners were - 

1. Government Service - Chiang Mon Lin - Taiwanese
2. Public Service - Operation Brotherhood - Philippines
3. Community Leadership - Acharya Vinoba Bhave - Indian
4. Journalism, Literature and Creative Communication Arts -
Robert Dick, Philippines and Mochtar Lubis, Indonesia
5. Peace and International Understanding - Mary Rutnam, Srilanka

Acharya Vinoba Bhave was the first Indian to win in 1958, in community leadership category.

48 indians have till now awarded the price.

2011 Magsaysay award winners from India Nileema Mishra and Harish Hande.

The other winners of the award for 2011 are: 

Filipino charity group Alternative Indigenous Development Foundation Inc. (AIDFI); 

Hasanain Juaini, who set up an Islamic school for girls in Indonesia;

Tri Mumpuni, Indonesia, who promoted micro hydropower technology;

Koul Panah, working to restore democracy in Cambodia.

Dr. Harish Hande, a U.S.-trained Indian engineer, was recognised for bringing solar lights to a country where half of the households have no power. The 44-year-old runs his own solar electric light company that has lit up over 1,20,000 households, to emerge as India's leading solar technology firm.

Ms. Neelima Mishra, a lender to the poorest in Maharashtra, was recognised for “her purpose-driven zeal to work tirelessly with villagers in Maharashtra...to address both their aspirations and their adversities through collective action and heightened confidence.”

"I know quite clearly what I want out of my life. Life and my emotions are the only things  I am conscious of. I love the consciousness of life and I want as much of it as I can get.  But the span of one's life is limited. What comes after death no one knows. Nor do I care. Since, therefore,  I cannot increase the content of life by increasing its duration, I will increase it by increasing its intensity.  Art, music, poetry and everything else that consciousness I do have this one purpose - increasing the  intensity of my consciousness of life". - H.J. Bhabha



Dr. Homi Jehangir Bhabha the chief architect of the Indian atomic energy program.


Dr. Bhabha, mechanical engineer and Phd from Cavendish Laboratory in physics by profession, from Gonvile and Caius College in Cambridge.


Dr. Bhabha was a world citizen qualified in all three subjects - education, science and culture.


In 1937, together with W. Heitler, a German physicist, Bhabha solved the riddle about cosmic rays. Cosmic rays are fast moving, extremely small particles coming from outer space. When these particles enter the earth’s atmosphere, they collide with the atoms of air and create a shower of electrons  by the cascade production of gamma rays and positive and negative electron pairs.. Bhabha’s discovery of the presence of nuclear particles (which he called mesons) in these showers . 'In 1938 Bhabha was the first to conclude that observations of the properties of such particles would lead to the straightforward experimental verification of Albert Einstein's theory of relativity'.


He derived a correct expression for the probability of scattering positrons by electrons, a process now known as Bhabha scattering.


In 1941, Homi Bhabha was elected Fellow of the Royal Society, London, in recognition of his contributions to the field of cosmic rays, elementary particles and quantum mechanics.


His Realization for a dedicated institute to research on fundamental science lead to the creation of Tata Institute of Fundamental Research in 1945 by The Great Legend, J R D Tata, Dr Bhabha become the Director of these institute from 1945-1966.It was inagurated in Kenilworth’ building, which was Bhabha’s ancestral home.


In 1948, Homi Bhabha was appointed the Chairman of the International Atomic Energy Commission.


Promulgation of the Indian Atomic Energy Act 1948, the Atomic Energy Commission was formed in August 1948.


The first Atomic Energy commission had three members with Bhabha as its Chairman. The other members were Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar and Kariamanikkam Srinivasa Krishnan.


Atomic Energy Commission started Atomic Energy Establishment, Trombay on January 3, 1954 by the efforts of Dr Bhabha.


He served as the President of the first United Nations Conference on the Peaceful Uses of Atomic Energy, which was held in Geneva in 1955.


He was the President of the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics from 1960 to 1963.


Bhabha was President of the National Institute of Sciences of India in 1963.


President of the Indian Science Congress Association in 1951.


He was awarded the title of Padma Bhushan by the Government of India in 1954.


Bhabha was elected a Fellow of the Royal Society in 1941.


In 1943 he was awarded the Adams Prize by the Cambridge University for his work on cosmic rays.


In 1948 ,the Hopkins prize of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.


In 1963 he was elected Foreign Associate of the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, and Honorary Life Member of the New York Academy of Sciences.


In 1964 he was made Foreign Corresponding Academician of the Royal Academy of Sciences, Madrid.


The research reactors Apsara, Cirus and Zerlina were built under his active guidance.


Bhabha was killed in an air-crash near the famous Mont Blanc peak of the Alps on January 24, 1966.


Atomic Energy Establishment, Trombay (AEET)  was renamed as Bhabha Atomic Research Center (BARC) on January 22, 1967 as a fitting tribute to Dr. Homi Bhabha who died in an air crash.

Atomic Models


Beginning of the 20th century:
(1) atoms were electrically neutral - equal amounts of + and - charge
(2) the negative charge is associated with cathode rays (electrons) particles having very small mass
(3) atoms are stable


J. J. Thomson (1900)
discovered the electron - cathode rays
plum-pudding model - electrons and protons evenly spread throughout the atom (diameter = 10-10 meters)


Max Planck (1900)
blackbody radiation
ultraviolet catastrophe
E = hf where f = c/λ


Brownian Motion (1827)
discovered initially by Scottish botanist, Robert Brown, when he witnessed pollen grains "jiggling" when examined under a microscope - later he saw the same agitated behavior with dust particles and grains of soot
"Brownian Motion" is now known to be the result of the collisions between neighboring atoms/molecules (Einstein - 1905)


Rutherford's gold foil experiment (1909) with Geiger and Marsden (repeated with carbon and aluminum)
1 out of every 8000 alpha particles scattered through an angle > 90°
discovered a small positively charged nucleus (diameter ≤ 10-14 meters)
the value of the charge needed from the scattering data would equate to the magnitude of the charge held in the nucleus - which would dictate the number of electrons surrounding the nucleus which closely matched the atomic number in Mendeleev's periodic table (1869)


Bohr model (1913) how were these electrons arranged?
steady orbitals - deBroglie wavelengths
energy levels - light emission, light absorption - excitation and de-excitation
spectral lines


Franck/Hertz (1914) experimentally verified discrete energy levels
bombarded room temperature mercury vapor with electrons of specific KE
absorption peak at 4.9 eV which was then shown to represent the energy of the 254 nm wavelength in mercury's emission spectrum


James Chadwich (1932)
discovered the neutron


Werner Heisenburg (1935)
first proposed the neutron-proton theory of nuclear structure.

1.     What is a credit rating?
A credit rating represents the rating agency's opinion on the likelihood of a rated debt obligation being repaid in full and on time. A simple alphanumeric symbol is normally used to convey a credit rating.

.
2.     How does a credit rating agency differ from a credit bureau?
A credit rating agency provides an opinion relating to future debt repayments by borrowers. A credit bureau provides information on past debt repayments by borrowers.

.
3.     Is a credit rating a recommendation to invest in a debt instrument?
A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, hold, or sell a debt instrument. A credit rating is one of the inputs used by investors to make an investment decision.

.
4.     What is the difference between credit rating and equity research?
Credit ratings are assigned to debt instruments, while equity research relates to equity shares. A credit rating is focused on the risk of non-payment, the primary variable in debt instruments. Equity research is focused on growth possibilities, for that is what drives equity valuations.

.
5.     How does a credit rating differ from an audit?
A credit rating agency relies on a variety of information sources, including published annual reports. An audit process is designed to detect fraud or misrepresentation of information, whereas the credit rating process is not.

.
6.     How does a rating agency operate when issuers' disclosure levels are low?
During a credit rating exercise, issuers provide rating agencies with confidential information and insights into business strategy that are not normally available in the public domain. As a policy, CRISIL does not assign credit ratings without issuer interaction, except when a previously rated instrument is outstanding or when a specific investor asks for a private exercise. In cases where CRISIL believes that the information is inadequate to assign a rating, it may not do so. Also, for rated clients, if subsequent information is not adequate, CRISIL may suspend the rating and inform the investors.

.
7.     Does a credit rating assure repayment?
A credit rating is not an assurance of repayment of the rated instrument. Rather, it is an opinion on the relative degree of risk associated with such repayment. This opinion represents a probabilistic estimate of the likelihood of default.

.
8.     Who pays for a credit rating?
Most credit rating agencies across the world use a revenue model where the issuer pays for the credit rating. Alternative revenue models (such as the one based on investor fees) pose numerous challenges in terms of ease and practicality of implementation that have not yet been overcome.

.
9.     If the issuer pays for the rating, how does a credit rating agency maintain its independence?
Although the issuer pays for the rating, the investor uses it. Like any other product or service, the 'value' of the rating depends entirely on the perceptions of the investor. Investor perceptions are based on the credibility of the past ratings assigned by each rating agency. (Please also refer to section - How CRISIL manages Conflict)

.
10.     Who regulates a rating agency?
The capital market regulator regulates rating agencies in most regions. In India, the capital markets regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), regulates the rating agencies in the country.

.
11.     Is competition desirable in the credit rating industry?
Competition in the credit rating industry is desirable to meet the 'better service at a cheaper price' objective on an ongoing basis. However, it is essential to guard against some undesirable effects of competition, such as lax ratings or sub-optimal quality of research and analysis.

.
12.     How do investors benefit from a credit rating?
Credit ratings help investors facilitate comparative assessment of investment options, complement the investors' own credit analysis, and allow asset monitoring.

.
13.     What do the various credit rating symbols mean?
CRISIL uses simple alphanumeric symbols to convey credit ratings. CRISIL assigns credit ratings to debt obligations on three basic scales: the long-term scale, the short-term scale, and the fixed deposit scale. To illustrate, CRISIL's long-term credit rating scale and the description associated with each category on the rating scale is given below:


Symbol
(Rating category).     Description (with regard to the likelihood of meeting the debt obligations on time)
AAA     Highest Safety
AA     High Safety
A     Adequate Safety
BBB     Moderate Safety
BB     Inadequate Safety
B     High Risk
C     Substantial Risk
D     Default
      

14.     Does the minus sign in a rating symbol have negative connotations relating to the issuer's performance or its debt-servicing capability?
Plus and minus symbols are used to indicate finer distinctions within a rating category. The minus symbol associated with ratings has no negative connotations whatsoever.
      

15.     What are Structured Obligation (so) ratings? Are they different from other credit ratings?
Structured Obligation (so) ratings are ratings that are based on a 'credit enhancement' mechanism and/or a structured payment mechanism. A suffix in the form of '(so)' indicates the presence of non-credit risk in the form of risks associated with the instrument structure.
      

16.     What is the validity period of a credit rating?
Credit ratings are assigned either to specific instruments or to the general debt obligations of issuers. CRISIL assigns credit ratings to debt obligations. A rating is valid until the rated debt obligation is fully paid.
      

17.     How are credit rating changes communicated?
Once a credit rating is assigned and published, CRISIL keeps the credit rating under surveillance until the instrument is fully repaid. The surveillance process may result in credit rating changes from time to time. All changes in CRISIL's credit ratings are communicated publicly through CRISIL's website (www.crisil.com) and media releases.
      

18.     Why do credit ratings change?
Credit ratings are assigned based on certain expectations and assumptions about variables that impact the issuer's performance. However, these variables can change, causing the rated entities' performance to deviate materially from expectations. This is reflected in their changed credit ratings.

.
19.     If a credit rating is downgraded, does it mean that a default is imminent?
Not necessarily. In most cases, a downgrade does not mean that a default is anticipated. All it indicates is that the risk associated with the debt obligation is relatively higher than what it was before the downgrade.

.
20.     Does the size of the rated debt obligation affect its credit rating?
No. What matters is the size of the total debt in the company, and not the amount that is sought to be rated.

This artical basically is meant for better understanding in the eyes of financial world and the mixed views of experts...............................................

The United States' loss of its top-notch AAA credit rating from Standard & Poor's on Friday drew mixed reactions from the world of finance.

Lou Crandall, chief economist, Wrightson Icap, Jersey City, N.J.:
"The circumstances under which they chose to spring this on the market aren't ideal, but in the end it's probably best to get this out of the way sooner rather than later. S&P had set the bar much higher than the other agencies for maintaining the AAA rating. If they had delayed this decision, we would have had to go through the autumn wondering if every setback for the joint select committee on deficit reduction (and there will be plenty of adverse headlines coming out of that process) would be the trigger for a move by S&P. If the outcome is an extended period of split ratings, the market can live with that." Story: US government loses triple-A credit rating
Douglas Borthwick, managing director, Faros Trading, Llc, Stamford, Conn.:
"We have been saying for some time that the U.S. was in danger of losing its AAA status, going so far as to state that we believed it was a foregone conclusion by the end of this week. S&P has now joined Chinese credit agencies, German credit agencies and the U.S.'s Egan Jones in downgrading the U.S. The latest debt ceiling and budget discussion has done little to turn around the ongoing U.S. fiscal issues. All eyes will be on China this weekend, as comments from China's (premier Wen Jiabao) are likely to provide direction for Sunday night's open. We expect this to be dollar negative across the board." Read the full S&P report in PDF format
Ira Jersey, interest rate strategist, Credit Suisse, New York:
"It matters a little bit to confidence, but any sell-off in rates could probably get bought. I suspect markets have priced it in and economic fundamentals will be driver of market, along with Europe.
"They don't only downgrade, they also upgrade. Ratings are a moving target. I can't say this was a good downgrade, it has a negative outlook. But I think it was expected."
Greg Salvaggio, senior vice president, Tempus Consulting, Washington D.C.:
"I really find it quite amazing that a credit agency that could rate mortgage backed securities AAA has decided to downgrade the U.S. government.
"I think the forecast overstated by between $2-3 trillion, the Treasury alerted them of the fact and they decided to go ahead with the downgrade anyway.
Story: Finger pointing follows debt downgrade
"In my job as an analyst, if my forecast were off by 2 million, or 200 million let alone 2 trillion it would make it incredibly hard to say to my peers that my analysis was sound.
"I find it to be incredibly troubling from a ratings agency with a very terrible history in the last three years of its ability to quantify risk.
"I'm a little bit fired up about it.
"What Moody's and Fitch have really quietly agreed to do is say, 'We are going to wait and see what the commission comes up with before a downgrade,' but S&P went ahead and did it anyway with numbers that were wrong.
"Traders put some credibility into the possibility of this downgrade. If you look at government bonds today, they closed down. Now we have to take a step back from our U.S. perspective, from an American pride perspective. Where else are you going to put your money right now? Europe is a mess....
I don't think there is going to be a mad rush to Swedish bonds, which is one of two countries that is still AAA.
David Meger, Vice President And Director Of Metals Trading With Vision Financial Markets, Chicago:
"One would expect the S&P downgrade to positively impact safe haven assets like gold, which continues to lead the safe-haven asset class. But, because the move was widely expected, we probably won't see a huge move on this news.
"The industrial metals, like copper, may get hit from the move, because it will add to the already weak economic picture that sent it down today. Silver has been a laggard, and it has an industrial component, so it may not be able to benefit as much as gold.
"This will put even closer scrutiny on Bernanke and the Fed this week to see if they will come up with QE3 or some type of stimulus plan."
Dean Popplewell, chief currency strategist at Oanda, Toronto:
"No one expected them to do it. They made sure Monday will not be boring! The dollar's woes will continue. Markets will apply further pressure on the dollar and equities. Investors will want to own the front end of the U.S. curve and sell 10s and bonds. The flight to quality trade will be extended."
Boris Schlossberg, director Of currency research At Gft, New York:
"It's probably going to put a little bit more stress on the dollar when we open in Asia on Sunday night. It's the first time in history that the S&P has downgraded the United States. Even though most of the investors are not required to hold a triple-A rating, there' still a significant minority that may decide to liquidate at least some part of their U.S. holdings now that the downgrade is in effect. At least initially, the impact on the market will be negative because there will some forced liquidation of U.S. assets. I don't think this is an unexpected move."
"They want the market to absorb the news over the weekend. It will mitigate the shock of the announcement. (Still), it may cause a pretty steep sell-off in Asia when we open as the market considers the significance of the news."
Pierre Ellis, senior economist, Decision Economics, New York:
"It's not totally unexpected. It's just the suddenness of the move and according to the S&P logic, it's justified. I don't know that it's unanticipated by the markets. There might be a mild reaction, but it won't be very pronounced. The timing is a little accelerated but it's no surprise. The S&P was looking for a longer term fiscal adjustment and that has not materialized and is unlikely to materialize before the election."
Ian Lyngen, Senior Government Bond Strategist, Crt Capital Group, Stamford, Conn.:
"The Treasury market to a large extent has anticipated either an official downgrade of the U.S. credit rating to double-A plus, or the looming threat. To some extent I would expect when Tokyo opens on Sunday that we will see an initial knee-jerk sell-off (in Treasuries) followed by a rally. The reason I would call it that way is because the Treasury market has shifted from trading off the flight to quality dynamic to trading off of U.S. fundamentals, and U.S. fundamentals -- despite the slightly better than consensus employment report today -- continue to suggest ongoing broader economic concerns with the potential for a double-dip recession.
"When you look at what has happened to other triple-A rated countries who have lost that rating it has tended to be a bullish period, which has been characterized by lower interest rates. That is more a factor of the broader economic expectations than it is of what the ratings agencies are saying.
"In the credit crisis of 2008 and 2009, the ratings agencies were dealing with a credibility issue. The fact that they have now downgraded the United States suggests to me that they are now going to be dealing with a relevance issue, because the fact of the matter is that 10-year (Treasury note) yields are near 2.5 percent, and that in no way suggests a lack of sponsorship for U.S. debt."
Paul Dales, chief U.S. economist, Capital Economics, Toronto, Canada:
"I don't think it will mean too much to be honest. There will probably be an initial market wobble — markets might struggle and Treasury yields might fall a bit.
"The bigger picture is really that the world is not much different than it was a few hours ago. People are simply going to focus on what is happening on the ground and that is the economic news."
Vassili Serebriakov, currency strategist at Wells Fargo, New York:
"It's not entirely unexpected. I believe it has already been partly priced into the dollar. We expect some further pressure on the U.S. dollar, but a sharp sell-off is in our view unlikely. One of the reasons we don't really think foreign investors will start selling U.S. Treasuries aggressively is because there are still few alternatives to the U.S. Treasury market in terms of depth and liquidity. It will probably put additional buying pressure on other safe-haven currencies such as the Japanese yen and Swiss franc. It will probably complicate the task for Japanese and Swiss authorities who are trying to curb currency gains."
Steve Blitz, senior economist, Itg, New York:
"I don't know how seriously everyone is going to take it. There is S&P and there is Moody's and we don't know if Moody's is going to follow with a downgrade of its own.
"If you think about the things they have rated AAA over the past few years, then you think about the U.S. economy with 15 trillion dollars of income every year and it's never not paid its debt.
"I think maybe S&P is under a lot of heat. I think the other side of it is they are also ready and willing to downgrade the whole financial system because the whole financial system holds its capital in Treasuries and it leverages itself off of that capital."
William Larkin, fixed income portfolio manager, Cabot Money Management, Salem, Mass.:
"I think we are going to test the system on Monday. One of the problems that everyone is worried about with a downgrade is there is a lot of investment guidelines where you are forced to maintain certain credit quality, and if you are bumping up against it, all of a sudden you are going to fall below your guidelines, so that means you probably have to buy more Treasuries and probably sell corporate debt or something like that.
"The interesting thing is going to be the impact on the municipal bond market because a lot of municipal bonds have as collateral U.S. Treasury securities. It is a tiny market and it is easily spooked but it is heavily invested in by retail investors. That is going to be the one I am going to be keeping an eye on.
"When they finally dealt with the debt ceiling they obviously kicked the can down the road, and the market did not need that. I thought at the time when they released it there would have been a downgrade.
"I don't think it is a great shock. If it didn't happen now I think it probably would have happened in a couple of months.
"A double-A plus is not a big issue, but it is going to have an impact. There are going to be ripples going across the pond."

BRIEF DESCRIPTION :
IT IS CODE NAMED OPERATION - OPERATION GERONIMO,THE OPERATION WAS AUTHORISED BY PRESIDENT BARAK OBAMA & CARRIED OUT A TEAM OF US NAVY ,SEAL 6,FROM  NAVAL SPECIAL WARFARE DEVELOPMENT GROUP UNDER THE COMMAND OF THE JOINT SPECIAL OPERATION COMMAND ,IN CONJUNCTION WITH US INTELLIGENCE ON MAY1,2011.

LAUNCHED FROM AFGHANISTAN ,THE RAID TOOK PLACE AT A SAFE HOUSE IN BILAL TOWN,ABOTTABAD ,PAKISTAN.
AFTER THE RAID ,US FORCES TOOK THE BODY OF OSAMA BIN LADEN TO AFGHANISTAN FOR IDENTIFICATION ,THEN BURIED IT AT SEA WITHIN 24 HOURS OF HIS DEATH.

OBJECTIVE:

 OBJECTIVE OF THE OPERATION WAS TO CAPTURE /ELIMINATE A HIGH VALUE TARGET(BIN LADEN) WITH MINIMUM COLLECTED DAMAGE.

PLANNING AND EXECUTION :

AFTER AN INTELLIGENCE GATHERING EFFORT ON THE COURIER `S PAKISTAN COMPOUND THAT BEGAN FROM SEPT 2010,PRESIDENT OBAMA MET WITH NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISERS ON 14 MARCH,2011 TO CREATE A PLAN.

SO MANY MULTIPLE COURSES OF ACTION WAS PRESENTED BY US OFFICIALS TO OBAMA IN MARCH & REFINED OVER THE COURSE OF NEXT SEVERAL WEEKS.

1ST APPROACH CONSIDERED BY US OFFICIALS WAS TO BOMB THE HOUSE USING B-2 SPIRIT STEALTH BOMBERS ,WHICH COULD DROP 32(2000 POUND) JOINT ATTACK MUNITIONS BUT OBAMA REJECTED THE PLAN,HOWEVER OPTING FOR RAID THAT WOULD PROVIDE DEFINITE PROOF THAT BIN LADEN WAS INSIDE  & LIMIT CIVILIAN CASUALTIES.

2ND APPROACH WAS A JOINT RAID WITH PAKISTAN INTELLIGENCE OPERATIVES WHICH COULD BE TOLD ABOUT THE MISSION ,HOURS BEFORE THE LAUNCH.

DEPLOYING DRONES WAS APPARENTLY NOT A FEASIBLE APPROACH ,IN PART BECAUSE OF LIMITED FIREPOWER AND IN PART BECAUSE THE COMPOUND `S LOC WAS WITHIN PAKISTAN AIR DEFENCE INTERCEPT ZONE FOR THE NATIONAL CAPITAL.

THE COMMANDO LED COA HAS MULTIPLE RISKS INCLUDING FACT THAT THE EXTENSIVE PREPARATION AND TRIGERING NECCESORY TO PULL IT OFF PROVIDED GREATER CHANCES TO LAEK OUT OVER THE ENSUING MONTHS.

ON APRIL 29,2011,OBAMA CONFERRED WITH BRENNAN,THOMAS E. DONILAN AND OTHERNATIONAL SECURITY ADVISORS AND GAVE THE FINAL ORDER TO RAID.

HOWEVER THE RAID PLANNED FOR THAT DAY WAS POSTPONED UNTIL THE FOLLOWING DAY DUE TOCLOUDY WEATHER.

THE OPERATION WAS CONDUCTED IN 3 PHASES:

1PHASE -INFILTERATION BY RAIDING PARTY:
 THE RAID WAS CARRIED OUT BY 24 HELICOPTER BORNE US NAVY SEALs OF JOINT SPECIAL OPERATION COMMAND.
THEY OPERATED IN TWO TEAMS OF 12 EACH,ACCORDINGLY  A TOTAL OF 79 COMMANDOS  AND A DOG WERE INVOLVED IN THE RAID.

SEALs FLEW TO THE PAKISTAN FROM THE STAGING BASE IN JALALABAD,AFGHANISTAN AFTER ORIGINATING AT BAGRAM AIR BASE.
THE OPERATORS WERE ARMED WITH M-4 ASSAULT RIFLES,NIGHT VISION GOGGLES & HAND-GUNS.
THEY USED TWO MODIFIED BLACK-HAWK HELICOPTERS AND 2 CHINOOKS FOR BACK-UPS.
THEY ARE STEALTH VERSION OF HELICOPTERS THAT ALLOWED IT TO FLY MORE QUIETLY AND WHILE BEING HARDER TO DETECTED ON  RADAR.THE RAID WAS SCHEDULED TO ATTACK ON MID NIGHT.
HELICOPTERS USED HILLY TERRAIN NAP OF THE EARTH TECHNIQUES TO REACH THE COMPOUND WITHOUT APPEARING ON RADAR AND ALERTING PAKISTAN MILLITARY.

2  PHASE- NEUTRALISING OF THE OSAMA BIN  LADEN:

ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN THE SEALs AND THE RESIDENTS TOOK PLACE IN THE GUEST HOUSE, IN  THE MAIN BUILDING ON THE 1ST FLOOR WHERE 2 ADULTS MALE LIVED  AND 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR WHERE OSAMA LIVED WITH HIS FAMILY .
IN ADDITION TO OSAMA ,3 OTHER MEN(HIS ADULT SONS,COURIER AND COURIER`S WIFE)

THE ONLY FIREFIGHT TOOK PLACE BETWEEN THE FIRST TEAM OF DEVGRU SEAL AND COURIER ,WHO LIVED INT HE GUEST HOUSE .THE COURIER`S RELATIVE AND OSAMA`S SON WERE BOTH KILLED IN THE MAIN HOUSE BY 2ND TEAM.ACCORDINGLY OSAMA`S 5TH WIFE WAS ONE OF THEINJURED WOMAN,WHEN SEALS ENTERED THE ROOM IN WHICH OSAMA WAS HIDING WITH HIS WIFE.

THE ENCOUNTER WITH THE OSAMA  BIN LADEN LASTED ONLY SECONDS AND TOOK PLACE DURING THE LAST 5 OR 10 MIN. OF THE RAID.

OSAMA WAS KILLED BY AT LEAST ONE OR POSSIBLY 2 BULLETS,ONE OF WHICH STRUCK ON HISLEFT SIDE OF HIS HEAD AND ANOTHER SHOT WAS WIDELY REPORTED TO BE A BULLET TO THE CHEST.

3PHASE  EX-FILTERATION BY THE RAIDING PARTY:

THE RAID WAS INTENDED TO TAKE 30 MIN. ALL TOLD THAT  THE TIME BETWEEN  THE TEAMS ENTRY AND EXIT FROM COMPOUND WAS 38 MIN.

TIME IN THE COMPOUND WAS SPENT NEUTRALIZING DEFENDERS ,MOVING CAREFULLY THROUGH THE COMPOUND ,ROOM TO ROOM,FLOOR TO FLOOR SECURING WOMEN AND CHILDREN CLEARING WEAPONS STASHES AND BARRICADES,INCLUDING A FALSE DOOR ,3 AK-47 AND 2 PISTOLS AND SEARCHING THE COMPOUND FOR INFORMATION,RECOVERED COMPUTER HARD DRIVES,DOCUMENTS,DVDS,THUMB DRIVES AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENTS FROM COMPOUND FOR LATER ANALYSIS.

THE HELICOPTER THAT MADE EMERGENCY LANDING WAS DAMAGED ,WAS UNABLE TO FLY ,SO HAVE TO DESTROY IT TO SAFE GUARD THE CLASSIFIED EQUIPMENT.

CONCLUSION:

OPERATION GERONIMO WAS THE CLASSICAL OPERATION CONDUCTED WITH THE SURGICAL .PRECESION DEEP INTO THE PAKISTANI TERRITORY WITH MINIMUM COLLATERAL DAMAGE .
THE SUCCESS OF THE OPERATION CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO THE DEPLY  AND INTER-OPERABILITY OF LARGE NO. OF STATE OF ART TECHNOLOGIES.

An essay is considered a complete composition. The essentials of essay writing would be the format(framework, structure), information (content, substance), language (expression, presentation), and logic (analysis and information).

The conventional design of looking at essay writing in terms of the introduction, body and conclusion is only the format. Although, this is fundamental to essay writing, the concept of an essay is quite intricate. An essay is expected to be a topical text that is self-explanatory and comprehensive, concise, composite and unambiguous, informative and logical.

For every effective composition one should ideally begin with clarifying the purpose of the composition to oneself. This is true about all written and spoken communication. It's best that this principle be applied to essay writing. Although, the question cues that are recommended at this point may appear archaic, they are useful and often overlooked. At every critical juncture, while writing a topical text all applicable queries must be asked to oneself about the issue in question, e.g. who, what, where, when, why, how? These questions would obtain answers that would make the text organised and accurate and also ensure that no aspect has been omitted. Proficiency in applying this principle, i.e. the appropriate choice of questions, will come with extensive practise, periodic evaluation and critical analysis.

The format comprises:
• An impact-oriented thematic introduction containing the core conceptual scheme, the defining criteria, the central idea, etc.
• A series of paragraphs containing arguments based on information, analysis and systematic inter-connectivity
• An overall impressive synoptic presentation or an effective conclusion or a final inference.


The introduction is the opening part of the essay and should be confined to a paragraph, especially since, unlike a book, the introduction of an essay is not captioned. The introductory paragraph is expected to introduce the topic, and wherever necessary, explain the central theme or idea, basic or core concepts, and definitional criteria. The introduction should arouse interest and generate curiosity in the mind of the reader, be it an examiner.

The main text of an essay, after the introductory part is over, essentially is a systematic organisation of information based on a consistent methodology. It deals with the topic and related issues to be addressed, the correlation of facts, figures, ideas, views, concepts; an in-depth, systematic, coherent analysis based on the topic leading to logical inferences; as well as making (if it is required) plausible projections and providing with (if necessary) viable solutions. The text of the composition must develop, support and explain the main ideas stated in your introduction or thesis paragraph

As the text draws close to the conclusion, the essay should have reached the stage of 'critical mass', a sort of a climax. The conclusion, a summary, should express the essence of the essay. It should not contain any fresh evidence, facts or figures